篇名 | |
---|---|
並列篇名 | The Missing Piece of Educational Administration in Taiwan: The Griffiths/Greenfield Debate and The Implications on Educational Administration |
作者 | 蘇鈺楠 |
中文摘要 | 理論運動與兩格論戰是教育行政學史上兩件重要大事,前者協助教育行政學成為嚴謹的學科,後者則催化教育行政學從量化典範轉為多元典範。在臺灣,關於兩者的研究與論述極為稀少,對照國內教育行政領域量化研究獨大的現象,衡酌如今全球教育行政之研究範圍愈趨複雜且多元,希望本文能有拋磚引玉之效,作為學界對話的開端。 |
英文摘要 | The Theory Movement and The Greenfield-Griffiths Debat are two major events in educational administration field. The former one lift the field as an academic science and the latter one transform the paradigm in it from empirical to multiple. However, there are few papers and voice about both significant events. Comparing the complexes and multiple trend in educational administration field, empirical still play a monopoly role in Taiwan. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to throw a sprat to catch a whale, hope to begin the conversation in educational administration field in Taiwan. |
起訖頁 | 091-105 |
關鍵詞 | 兩格論戰、教育行政典範、教育行政哲學、理論運動、the greenfield-griffiths debate、paradigm of educational administration、educational administration philosophy、the theory movement |
刊名 | 教育研究集刊 |
期數 | 201909 (65:3期) |
出版單位 | 國立臺灣師範大學教育學系 |
DOI | 10.3966/102887082019096503004 複製DOI |
該期刊-上一篇 | 論「通過/不通過制」在大學教育的誤用與重塑 |
該期刊-下一篇 | 書評:評《教育領域與研究的社會史》 |